1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 2005 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,308 cc, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP) has 133 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 520 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A 110 | 2005 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Alpine | Mazda |
Model | A 110 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 228 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 193 km/hour | 235 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 1065 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 61 L |