1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volkswagen Polo (100 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110.
Because 1966 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A 110 | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Alpine | Volkswagen |
| Model | A 110 | Polo |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 100 HP |
| Top Speed | 193 km/hour | 184 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 45 L |
