1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,390 cc, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alpine A 110 (95 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alpine A 110 should accelerate faster than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 510 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110.
Because 1966 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A 110 | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Alpine | Volkswagen |
| Model | A 110 | Polo |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1390 cc |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 75.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 193 km/hour | 172 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 1055 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 45 L |
