1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alpine A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A 110 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Alpine | Ford |
Model | A 110 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1966 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 87.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 94 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 59 L |