1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 2008 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2008 Jeep Compass is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Compass (172 HP) has 77 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Compass weights approximately 1406 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alpine A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A 110 | 2008 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Alpine | Jeep |
Model | A 110 | Compass |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 172 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 1951 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 51 L |