1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 2009 BMW M3
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP) has 319 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 BMW M3 weights approximately 775 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A 110 | 2009 BMW M3 | |
| Make | Alpine | BMW |
| Model | A 110 | M3 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 3999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 414 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 12.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 193 km/hour | 245 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 63 L |
