1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 2009 Honda Element
To start off, 2009 Honda Element is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 2,354 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Honda Element is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Honda Element (164 HP) has 69 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Honda Element should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110.
Because 1966 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Honda Element, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A 110 | 2009 Honda Element | |
Make | Alpine | Honda |
Model | A 110 | Element |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 164 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 65 L |