1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 2009 Lotus Evora

To start off, 2009 Lotus Evora is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Lotus Evora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lotus Evora (276 HP) has 181 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Alpine A 110 2009 Lotus Evora
Make Alpine Lotus
Model A 110 Evora
Year Released 1966 2009
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Rear Middle
Engine Size 1108 cc 3500 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 95 HP 276 HP
Top Speed 193 km/hour 252 km/hour
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 4350 mm
Vehicle Width 1560 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1120 mm 1230 mm
Wheelbase Size 2110 mm 2580 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]