1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 2009 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2009 Nissan Rogue is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Rogue (170 HP) has 75 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 1060 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Nissan Rogue is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alpine A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Rogue will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A 110 | 2009 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Alpine | Nissan |
Model | A 110 | Rogue |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 170 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 99.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 82.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 1605 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 60 L |