1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 2010 Ford Ka
To start off, 2010 Ford Ka is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alpine A 110 (95 HP) has 27 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ka. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alpine A 110 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ka.
Because 1966 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A 110 | 2010 Ford Ka | |
Make | Alpine | Ford |
Model | A 110 | Ka |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 68 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 74.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 10.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 40 L |