1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 2010 Lada Niva
To start off, 2010 Lada Niva is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,690 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Lada Niva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alpine A 110 (95 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2010 Lada Niva. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alpine A 110 should accelerate faster than 2010 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lada Niva weights approximately 740 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110.
Because 2010 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alpine A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A 110 | 2010 Lada Niva | |
| Make | Alpine | Lada |
| Model | A 110 | Niva |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 193 km/hour | 137 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 1285 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 45 L |
