1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (148 HP) has 99 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110.
Because 2010 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alpine A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A 110 | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Alpine | Nissan |
| Model | A 110 | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 956 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 65 L |
