1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 2011 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2011 Toyota Highlander is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Highlander (280 HP) has 185 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 1615 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Toyota Highlander is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alpine A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Highlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A 110 | 2011 Toyota Highlander | |
| Make | Alpine | Toyota |
| Model | A 110 | Highlander |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 280 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 2160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4796 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2789 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 65 L |
