1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 2012 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2012 Dodge Ram is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Ram (212 HP) has 117 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A 110 | 2012 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Alpine | Dodge |
| Model | A 110 | Ram |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 212 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 88.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 100 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2900 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 98 L |
