1966 Alpine A vs. 1963 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 1966 Alpine A is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alpine A (108 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 0 more horse power than 1963 Ford Zodiac. (108 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alpine A should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Zodiac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 645 kg more than 1966 Alpine A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A | 1963 Ford Zodiac | |
| Make | Alpine | Ford |
| Model | A | Zodiac |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1296 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1270 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2780 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 45 L |
