1966 Alpine A vs. 1969 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1969 Cadillac Calais is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A. (108 HP @ 6900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1475 kg more than 1966 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A | 1969 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | Alpine | Cadillac |
| Model | A | Calais |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1296 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3300 mm |
