1966 Alpine A vs. 1979 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1979 Ford Falcon is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 3,271 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Ford Falcon (129 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A. (108 HP @ 6900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Ford Falcon weights approximately 755 kg more than 1966 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A | 1979 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Alpine | Ford |
Model | A | Falcon |
Year Released | 1966 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 3271 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2830 mm |