1966 Alpine A vs. 1989 Alfa Romeo 164
To start off, 1989 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Alfa Romeo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Alfa Romeo 164 (123 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A. (108 HP @ 6900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Alfa Romeo 164 should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Alfa Romeo 164 weights approximately 865 kg more than 1966 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A | 1989 Alfa Romeo 164 | |
Make | Alpine | Alfa Romeo |
Model | A | 164 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 70 L |