1966 Alpine A vs. 1990 Buick LeSabre
To start off, 1990 Buick LeSabre is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Buick LeSabre (165 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A. (108 HP @ 6900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 851 kg more than 1966 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Buick LeSabre, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A | 1990 Buick LeSabre | |
Make | Alpine | Buick |
Model | A | LeSabre |
Year Released | 1966 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1476 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 68 L |