1966 Alpine A vs. 1996 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alpine A (108 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alpine A should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 605 kg more than 1966 Alpine A.
Because 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alpine A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A | 1996 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | Alpine | Chevrolet |
| Model | A | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1589 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1230 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2210 mm |
