1966 Alpine A vs. 1999 Mercury Sable
To start off, 1999 Mercury Sable is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mercury Sable weights approximately 977 kg more than 1966 Alpine A.
Because 1966 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A | 1999 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Alpine | Mercury |
Model | A | Sable |
Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 2986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1602 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2760 mm |