1966 Alpine A vs. 2000 Cadillac XLR
To start off, 2000 Cadillac XLR is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac XLR (301 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A. (108 HP @ 6900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 1029 kg more than 1966 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A | 2000 Cadillac XLR | |
| Make | Alpine | Cadillac |
| Model | A | XLR |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1296 cc | 4565 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1654 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 68 L |
