1966 Alpine A vs. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 915 kg more than 1966 Alpine A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A | 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Alpine | Chevrolet |
| Model | A | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1296 cc | 5670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 57 L |
