1966 Alpine A vs. 2000 Dodge Intrepid
To start off, 2000 Dodge Intrepid is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 3,517 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Intrepid is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Intrepid (242 HP) has 134 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Intrepid should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Intrepid weights approximately 945 kg more than 1966 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Intrepid, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A | 2000 Dodge Intrepid | |
Make | Alpine | Dodge |
Model | A | Intrepid |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 3517 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 242 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2990 mm |