1966 Alpine A vs. 2000 Saturn SC
To start off, 2000 Saturn SC is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Saturn SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alpine A (108 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2000 Saturn SC. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alpine A should accelerate faster than 2000 Saturn SC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Saturn SC weights approximately 445 kg more than 1966 Alpine A.
Because 1966 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Saturn SC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A | 2000 Saturn SC | |
| Make | Alpine | Saturn |
| Model | A | SC |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1901 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 60 L |
