1966 Alpine A vs. 2003 Chevrolet SS
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet SS is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet SS (430 HP) has 322 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet SS should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet SS weights approximately 1035 kg more than 1966 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A | 2003 Chevrolet SS | |
Make | Alpine | Chevrolet |
Model | A | SS |
Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 430 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3080 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 64 L |