1966 Alpine A vs. 2003 Mazda Demio
To start off, 2003 Mazda Demio is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda Demio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alpine A (108 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2003 Mazda Demio. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alpine A should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda Demio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda Demio weights approximately 335 kg more than 1966 Alpine A.
Because 1966 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Demio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A | 2003 Mazda Demio | |
| Make | Alpine | Mazda |
| Model | A | Demio |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1323 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2400 mm |
