1966 Alpine A vs. 2004 Volvo S80
To start off, 2004 Volvo S80 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S80 (138 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A. (108 HP @ 6900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo S80 weights approximately 905 kg more than 1966 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A | 2004 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Alpine | Volvo |
Model | A | S80 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 70 L |