1966 Alpine A vs. 2005 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2005 Dodge Charger is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Charger (340 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A. (108 HP @ 6900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Charger weights approximately 1203 kg more than 1966 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A | 2005 Dodge Charger | |
| Make | Alpine | Dodge |
| Model | A | Charger |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1296 cc | 5654 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 340 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1828 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3030 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 72 L |
