1966 Alpine A vs. 2005 Hyundai Matrix
To start off, 2005 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Hyundai Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Hyundai Matrix (123 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A. (108 HP @ 6900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Hyundai Matrix should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Hyundai Matrix weights approximately 1185 kg more than 1966 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Hyundai Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A | 2005 Hyundai Matrix | |
Make | Alpine | Hyundai |
Model | A | Matrix |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1810 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 55 L |