1966 Alpine A vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Rover 75 (256 HP) has 148 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 790 kg more than 1966 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A | 2008 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Alpine | Rover |
| Model | A | 75 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1296 cc | 4601 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 256 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1415 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 65 L |
