1966 Alpine A vs. 2009 Chrysler Crossfire
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A. (108 HP @ 6900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 1410 kg more than 1966 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A | 2009 Chrysler Crossfire | |
Make | Alpine | Chrysler |
Model | A | Crossfire |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 2035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 60 L |