1966 Alpine A vs. 2009 Lada 21
To start off, 2009 Lada 21 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 1,594 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Lada 21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alpine A (108 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2009 Lada 21. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alpine A should accelerate faster than 2009 Lada 21. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lada 21 weights approximately 445 kg more than 1966 Alpine A.
Because 1966 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lada 21, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A | 2009 Lada 21 | |
| Make | Alpine | Lada |
| Model | A | 21 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1594 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 89 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 43 L |
