1966 Alpine A vs. 2009 Mercury Grand Marquis
To start off, 2009 Mercury Grand Marquis is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercury Grand Marquis (221 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A. (108 HP @ 6900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Grand Marquis should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercury Grand Marquis weights approximately 1300 kg more than 1966 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A | 2009 Mercury Grand Marquis | |
Make | Alpine | Mercury |
Model | A | Grand Marquis |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 4606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 221 HP |
Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 62 L |