1966 Alpine A vs. 2009 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2009 Nissan Armada is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Armada (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A. (108 HP @ 6900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Armada weights approximately 817 kg more than 1966 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alpine A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A | 2009 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Alpine | Nissan |
| Model | A | Armada |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1296 cc | 5551 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 317 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1442 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1990 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 106 L |
