1966 Alpine A vs. 2009 Nissan GT-R
To start off, 2009 Nissan GT-R is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Nissan GT-R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan GT-R (478 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 370 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A. (108 HP @ 6900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan GT-R should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan GT-R weights approximately 817 kg more than 1966 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Nissan GT-R is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alpine A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan GT-R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A | 2009 Nissan GT-R | |
Make | Alpine | Nissan |
Model | A | GT-R |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 3797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 478 HP |
Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1442 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 65 L |