1966 Alpine A vs. 2010 Ford F-150
To start off, 2010 Ford F-150 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-150 (248 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A. (108 HP @ 6900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford F-150 weights approximately 1714 kg more than 1966 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A | 2010 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Alpine | Ford |
Model | A | F-150 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 248 HP |
Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 2339 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5885 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 2004 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1887 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 98 L |