1966 Alpine A vs. 2011 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Orlando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando (139 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A. (108 HP @ 6900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 903 kg more than 1966 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alpine A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A | 2011 Chevrolet Orlando | |
| Make | Alpine | Chevrolet |
| Model | A | Orlando |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 139 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1528 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4652 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1836 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1633 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2760 mm |
