1966 Alpine A vs. 2011 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2011 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 2,606 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda BT-50 (123 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A. (108 HP @ 6900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 925 kg more than 1966 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alpine A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A | 2011 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Alpine | Mazda |
Model | A | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 2606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 50 L |