1966 Alpine A vs. 2011 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2011 Toyota Tundra is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Tundra (233 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A. (108 HP @ 6900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 449 kg more than 1966 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A | 2011 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Alpine | Toyota |
| Model | A | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1296 cc | 3998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 233 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1074 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 50 L |
