1966 Alpine A vs. 2011 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2011 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 1,296 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Alpine A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Volkswagen Polo (178 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A. (108 HP @ 6900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 644 kg more than 1966 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A | 2011 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Alpine | Volkswagen |
Model | A | Polo |
Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 178 HP |
Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1269 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1682 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1462 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2470 mm |