1966 Alpine A vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 448 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A. (108 HP @ 6900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 1290 kg more than 1966 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A | 2012 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Alpine | Cadillac |
| Model | A | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1296 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 556 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4788 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1882 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1422 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 68 L |
