1966 Alpine A vs. 2012 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2012 Subaru Outback is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Subaru Outback (170 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A. (108 HP @ 6900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Subaru Outback weights approximately 911 kg more than 1966 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Subaru Outback is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alpine A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A | 2012 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Alpine | Subaru |
Model | A | Outback |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1536 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 70 L |