1966 Alpine A vs. 2013 Mazda 3
To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 3 (146 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A. (108 HP @ 6900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 3 weights approximately 675 kg more than 1966 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Alpine A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A | 2013 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Alpine | Mazda |
Model | A | 3 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4595 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 55 L |