1966 Alvis TF vs. 1950 Simca 8
To start off, 1966 Alvis TF is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Simca 8 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alvis TF (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1950 Simca 8. (47 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alvis TF should accelerate faster than 1950 Simca 8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Alvis TF (247 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Simca 8. (88 Nm). This means 1966 Alvis TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Simca 8.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alvis TF | 1950 Simca 8 | |
| Make | Alvis | Simca |
| Model | TF | 8 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1221 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Torque | 247 Nm | 88 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 6.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2450 mm |
