1966 Alvis TF vs. 1954 Rover P4
To start off, 1966 Alvis TF is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alvis TF (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1954 Rover P4. (74 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alvis TF should accelerate faster than 1954 Rover P4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Alvis TF (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Rover P4. (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1966 Alvis TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Rover P4.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 1954 Rover P4 | |
Make | Alvis | Rover |
Model | TF | P4 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2103 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 7.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 52 L |