1966 Alvis TF vs. 1954 Triumph TR2
To start off, 1966 Alvis TF is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Triumph TR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Triumph TR2 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alvis TF (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1954 Triumph TR2. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alvis TF should accelerate faster than 1954 Triumph TR2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Alvis TF (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Triumph TR2. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Alvis TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Triumph TR2.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alvis TF | 1954 Triumph TR2 | |
Make | Alvis | Triumph |
Model | TF | TR2 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1954 |
Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 247 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2250 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 56 L |