1966 Alvis TF vs. 1959 Triumph Herald
To start off, 1966 Alvis TF is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alvis TF (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1959 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alvis TF should accelerate faster than 1959 Triumph Herald.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Alvis TF (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1966 Alvis TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alvis TF | 1959 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | Alvis | Triumph |
| Model | TF | Herald |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1959 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1145 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 247 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2330 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 29 L |
