1966 Alvis TF vs. 1962 Mini MK I
To start off, 1966 Alvis TF is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mini MK I would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Alvis TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alvis TF (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1962 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alvis TF should accelerate faster than 1962 Mini MK I.
Because 1966 Alvis TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alvis TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Alvis TF (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mini MK I. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1966 Alvis TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alvis TF | 1962 Mini MK I | |
| Make | Alvis | Mini |
| Model | TF | MK I |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 247 Nm | 61 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2040 mm |
