1966 Alvis TF vs. 1969 AMC AMX
To start off, 1969 AMC AMX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 6,384 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 AMC AMX (340 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 AMC AMX should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 AMC AMX (583 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 336 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alvis TF. (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1969 AMC AMX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alvis TF | 1969 AMC AMX | |
| Make | Alvis | AMC |
| Model | TF | AMX |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 6384 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 340 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 247 Nm | 583 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2680 mm |
